One blind man or two, leaving Jericho or coming near it?
Luke tells of a man healed before Jesus entered Jericho; Matthew and Mark of two as He left, Mark naming one of them.
The Passages
Matthew 20:29-34
Mark 10:46-52
See Also
Luke 18:35-43
The Difficulty
Matthew says that “as they departed from Jericho … two blind men sitting by the way side” cried to Him (Matthew 20:29–30). Mark tells of one, “blind Bartimaeus,” healed “as he went out of Jericho” (Mark 10:46). Luke tells of “a certain blind man” healed “as he was come nigh unto Jericho” (Luke 18:35). Two men or one; going out or coming in?
The Answer
Preferred: these are two healings, not one told three ways. Luke places his before Jesus entered the city, and then goes on: “And Jesus entered and passed through Jericho” (Luke 19:1), and the story of Zacchaeus follows. Matthew and Mark tell of what happened on the way out. Mark names Bartimaeus, the better known of the two Matthew mentions; he doesn’t say there was only one, and Matthew doesn’t say there were only two blind men healed at Jericho. The cry “Son of David, have mercy” was the natural cry of any blind man who had heard of Him.
Also given: Luke’s word (engizō) can mean to be near, not only to draw near, so that he too may be telling of the healing outside the city, mentioning one man as Mark does (Haley). Gill rejects this because Luke goes on to say Jesus then entered Jericho.
The accounts differ in what each tells; none of them denies what another says.
Sources
-
Mark and Luke make mention but of one; which is no contradiction to Matthew; for they neither of them say that there was but one. … To me it seems, that there were three blind men cured; one before he went into Jericho, which Luke only relates, and two as he came out of Jericho.
Checked against: Internet Archive scan of the first edition, 2026-10-23 -
Some think there were three blind men healed, — one when Jesus entered the city, the other two when he left it.
Checked against: Internet Archive scan of the 1874 edition, 2026-10-19