Difficult Passages · Numbers in Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles

Why do Ezra’s and Nehemiah’s lists of the returning families differ?

Ezra gives the list taken when the people set out from Babylon; Nehemiah, the register of the company as it came up.

The Passages

Ezra 2:13
13 The children of Adonikam, six hundred sixty and six.
Nehemiah 7:18
18 The children of Adonikam, six hundred threescore and seven.

See Also

Ezra 2:1
1 Now these are the children of the province that went up out of the captivity, of those which had been carried away, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away unto Babylon, and came again unto Jerusalem and Judah, every one unto his city;
Nehemiah 7:5
5 And my God put into mine heart to gather together the nobles, and the rulers, and the people, that they might be reckoned by genealogy. And I found a register of the genealogy of them which came up at the first, and found written therein,
Ezra 2:64
64 The whole congregation together was forty and two thousand three hundred and threescore,
Nehemiah 7:66
66 The whole congregation together was forty and two thousand three hundred and threescore,

The Difficulty

Ezra and Nehemiah give the same list of the families that came up from Babylon with Zerubbabel, but many of their numbers differ. “The children of Adonikam, six hundred sixty and six” (Ezra 2:13); “The children of Adonikam, six hundred threescore and seven” (Nehemiah 7:18). The children of Arah are “seven hundred seventy and five” in Ezra and “six hundred fifty and two” in Nehemiah (Ezra 2:5; Nehemiah 7:10), and so through the list, some more and some fewer. Yet both give the same total: “The whole congregation together was forty and two thousand three hundred and threescore” (Ezra 2:64; Nehemiah 7:66).

The Answer

Preferred: The two lists were made at two times. Ezra’s is the list of “the children of the province that went up out of the captivity” (Ezra 2:1), as their names were given in at Babylon when they set out under the decree of Cyrus. Nehemiah’s is one he found nearly a century later, “a register of the genealogy of them which came up at the first” (Nehemiah 7:5), which Gill takes to have been made when the company came to Jerusalem. Between the two, some who gave in their names stayed behind or died on the way, and others who hadn’t given them in followed and joined the company. So some families are more in Nehemiah and some fewer, as the singing men and women are (Ezra 2:65; Nehemiah 7:67).

The total is the same in both because it is the number of the whole congregation, counted as one company (Ezra 2:64), not the sum of the families: neither book says its families add up to it, and the congregation took in those who “could not shew their father’s house” (2:59) as well as the families listed.

Sources

  1. In some instances there are more in this list, in others fewer, which may be thus accounted for; that list was made in Babylon, when, upon the edict of Cyrus, the Jews, who intended to go up with Zerubbabel, gave in their names, and they were registered; but this was made when they came to Jerusalem; now some of those that gave in their names changed their minds, and tarried in Babylon, and some might die by the way, which makes the numbers fewer in some instances; and others who did not give in their names at first, but, being better disposed towards their own country, followed after and joined those which were returning, and increased the number of others.
    Checked against: Internet Archive scan of the first edition, 2026-10-28